![]() In fact, the Schönberg-Whitney theorem states that, if you choose the $i$-th interpolation node $\xi_i$ to lie in the interior of the support of the $i$-th B-spline function, then the resulting nodes $(x_i)$ are unisolvent. However, choosing the Gréville abscissae is not the only possible choice. See for instance the definition of Gréville abscissae, which are just particular interpolation nodes, here. For a spline space, however, it is common to choose the interpolation nodes as certain averages of the knots. For a sequence of knots, $(t_1, \ldots, t_m)$, a spline is a function which is polynomial when restricted to each nonempty knot span $(t_i, t_)$ and satisfies some additional continuity assumptions in the knots. Knots are something which is particular to the way splines are constructed. This is a general concept, no matter how the space looks like. You can call any set which is unisolvent a set of interpolation nodes, since you can do interpolation in them. This property is called unisolvency of the points $(\xi_i)$ for the space $\Phi$. By clicking this color square you open the standard KDE color selection dialog. The Display Section Text color: The color square shows the current text color. The KNotes KNotes Settings dialog will open. Then, the nodes would be $n$ points $(\xi_1, \ldots, \xi_n)$ in the domain of your basis functions which satisfy the following: for arbitrary given values $(y_1, \ldots, y_n)$, you can find a unique $f \in \Phi$ such thatį(\xi_i) = y_i \qquad \forall i=1,\ldots,n. To configure KNotes right mouse button click on the panel icon. Let's say you have a vector space (which you want to interpolate in) $\Phi$ of dimension $n$. Various other texts seem to talk about nodes and knots as two distinctly different things and some also talk about spline control points which seem to not have been necessary to introduce in Unser's paper? Comparing to my understanding of nodes from Lagrange interpolation, it seems the signal samples $s(k)$ play the role of those nodes and so, the knots $k$ coincide with the locations of these samples. ![]() The paper, however, talks about samples of the signal $s(k)$ we wish to interpolate (where the knots are $k$). This paper, which is written in a wonderfully intuitive way for a signal processing engineer like me to understand, only mentions knots - not nodes. In particular, I have studied B-splines in Unser, Splines - A Perfect Fit for Signal and Image Processing. It is my impression that the nodes and knots typically coincide which could explain why the literature I have read does not seem to mention nodes in relation to splines? ![]() It is my impression that nodes are the known points between which you wish to interpolate while knots are the points where the spline segments of a spline curve meet. From this, it is not entirely clear to me what the difference is. The literature I have read about spline interpolation, however, talks only about knots. ![]() I have been reading literature about polynomial interpolation (Lagrange) where the principles are described around nodes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |